Slip and fall injuries are among the most common workplace injuries in healthcare — and most of them happen on floors that look perfectly safe. Hospital tile is intentionally smooth for infection control purposes. Disinfectants reduce surface friction further. Fluid spills in patient rooms, hallways, and procedure areas happen constantly. The result is a floor environment that’s genuinely more hazardous than it appears.
As an internal medicine resident, I’ve seen the consequences of inadequate footwear traction in clinical settings. A near-miss during a quick pivot in a patient room. A colleague whose ankle rolled on a freshly mopped hallway. These aren’t dramatic falls — they’re the kind of subtle slips that create joint strain and instability that compound over a long career.
The frustrating thing about slip resistance as a shoe feature is that it’s genuinely hard to evaluate from a product listing. ‘Slip-resistant’ appears on shoes that have very different levels of actual traction performance. This guide explains what the ratings actually mean, which shoes have genuine clinical-grade traction, and which popular nursing shoes fall short despite their reputation.
What ‘Slip-Resistant’ Actually Means — And Why It Matters
Most shoes marketed as slip-resistant are not independently tested or rated. The term appears on product listings because it’s a selling point, not because the manufacturer has met a defined standard. For clinical environments where the consequences of a fall are real, the difference between a marketing claim and a tested rating matters.
The ASTM F2913 Standard — What It Is in Plain Language
ASTM F2913 is the American standard for measuring footwear slip resistance on contaminated surfaces. It’s the rating system used by occupational safety organizations and hospital safety officers when evaluating workplace footwear.
The test measures something called the Dynamic Coefficient of Friction (DCOF) — essentially how much grip a shoe’s outsole maintains while moving across a surface under controlled contamination conditions. The contaminated surface used in testing is a wet ceramic tile with a specific soap solution applied, which is designed to approximate the conditions of a cleaned hospital floor.
A DCOF value above 0.42 is considered the minimum for safe level walking on wet surfaces. Shoes that meet or exceed this threshold under ASTM F2913 conditions have demonstrated actual traction performance under conditions that approximate clinical floor environments. Shoes without this rating may still have good traction — but you’re relying on the manufacturer’s claim rather than independent testing.
Why Most Running Shoes Fail This Test
Standard running shoes are designed for road and trail surfaces. Their outsole compounds and tread patterns are optimized for those environments — which are textured, varied, and naturally grippy compared to smooth hospital tile. When a running shoe outsole meets smooth wet clinical tile, the physics are different from what the shoe was designed for.
This is why the HOKA Bondi SR exists as a separate product from the HOKA Bondi 9. The SR has a completely different outsole compound and tread pattern specifically engineered for smooth clinical surfaces. It’s not a modification — it’s a different product designed for a different surface type. Most runners and casual wearers would never need it. Most hospital workers do.
What to Look for Beyond the Rating
The ASTM F2913 rating tells you a shoe passed a minimum threshold test. Within rated shoes, traction performance still varies based on outsole compound chemistry, tread pattern design, and contact patch width. Deeper, multi-directional tread grooves channel fluid away from the contact surface more effectively. Wider outsoles provide more surface area in contact with the floor. Softer rubber compounds conform more closely to surface irregularities and provide better grip at lower pressure.
The practical implication: among ASTM-rated shoes, the ones with broader outsoles, softer rubber compounds, and more complex tread patterns will outperform the minimum-passing options on genuinely wet clinical surfaces.
Quick Picks — Best Slip-Resistant Shoes for Nurses
| Shoe | Best For | ASTM Rated |
|---|---|---|
| HOKA Bondi SR | Best overall — cushioning + clinical traction | ✅ Yes |
| Shoes For Crews Element III | Maximum slip resistance, specialized | ✅ Yes |
| Brooks Addiction Walker | Stability + traction for flat feet | ✅ Yes |
| Dansko XP 2.0 | Standing-heavy roles, clog style | ✅ Yes |
| Skechers Sure Track | Budget slip-resistant option | ✅ Yes |
| On Cloudrunner 2 | Lightweight, moderate traction | ⚠️ Limited |
Best Slip-Resistant Shoes for Nurses — In Depth
1. HOKA Bondi SR — Best Overall
The HOKA Bondi SR is the most complete slip-resistant nursing shoe available because it solves the problem that most slip-resistant shoes create — it provides genuine clinical-grade traction without compromising on the cushioning and comfort that nurses need for 12-hour shifts (see our full guide on best shoes for 12 hour shifts).
Most workplace slip-resistant shoes sacrifice cushioning for traction. The outsole compounds that provide the best grip on smooth wet surfaces tend to be firmer and denser than the responsive foams used in athletic shoes, which means dedicated work shoes often feel hard and fatiguing over long shifts. The Bondi SR solves this by keeping HOKA’s thick EVA midsole platform and engineering the slip resistance into the outsole layer specifically — so the cushioning experience is equivalent to the Bondi 9 while the traction is workplace-rated.
The traction specifics: The Bondi SR uses a rubber compound and tread pattern designed for smooth clinical surfaces rather than road running. The wider outsole platform that characterizes all Bondi models also contributes to stability on slick surfaces — more contact area means less concentrated pressure points that can slip. The ASTM F2913 rating means the traction has been independently tested rather than just claimed.
Beyond traction: The water-resistant leather upper is easy to wipe clean after fluid exposure. The rocker sole geometry reduces fascia strain during push-off and calf fatigue during high step-count shifts. The wide stable base handles both walking-heavy and standing-heavy shift patterns. For most nurses, this is the one shoe that covers all clinical demands without meaningful compromise.
The honest trade-off: The leather upper is less breathable than mesh, which becomes noticeable in warm environments during physically demanding shifts. It’s priced at the premium end. And some nurses find the bulkier Bondi platform too heavy for fast-paced units where weight matters.
Best for: Most hospital nurses who want the best combination of clinical traction, cushioning, and long-shift comfort in a single shoe. The default recommendation for anyone prioritizing genuine slip resistance.
2. Shoes For Crews Element III — Best Specialized Slip Resistance
Shoes For Crews is the brand that hospital safety officers and occupational health departments actually reference when specifying footwear requirements — and the Element III is their flagship clinical model. If you want the most specialized slip-resistant shoe available for healthcare environments, this is it.
The brand’s outsole technology is proprietary and specifically engineered for the floor conditions found in healthcare and food service environments — smooth, wet, often contaminated with cleaning solutions. Independent testing consistently places Shoes For Crews outsoles at the top of DCOF performance charts for wet smooth surfaces, outperforming most athletic shoes with slip-resistant claims and most dedicated work shoes as well.
What makes it clinically specialized: The outsole compound is softer and more conforming than most work shoes, allowing it to make closer contact with smooth tile surfaces and maintain grip under contamination conditions. The tread pattern is multi-directional specifically to handle the quick pivots and direction changes of healthcare work rather than the linear movement of walking. It meets ASTM F2913 with meaningful margin rather than at the minimum threshold.
The honest trade-off: The cushioning is competent but not at the level of the HOKA Bondi SR. For nurses whose primary concern is maximum slip resistance above all else — trauma nurses, environmental services, units with the highest fluid exposure — the Element III is the right call. For nurses who need to balance slip resistance with cushioning for plantar fasciitis or joint pain, the Bondi SR’s cushioning advantage matters more. The styling is also more utilitarian than athletic — it reads as a work shoe rather than a performance shoe.
Best for: Nurses and healthcare workers in the highest fluid-exposure environments who prioritize traction performance above cushioning. Trauma bays, OR, procedural areas with frequent floor contamination. Also the shoe most likely to satisfy a hospital’s formal footwear safety policy.
3. Brooks Addiction Walker — Best for Traction Plus Motion Control
The Brooks Addiction Walker earns its place on this list by being the only shoe that combines genuine ASTM-rated slip resistance with aggressive motion control for overpronation — a combination that most slip-resistant shoes don’t offer.
For nurses with flat feet or significant overpronation, the usual slip-resistant shoe options don’t address their alignment needs. The Addiction Walker does both. The Progressive Diagonal Rollbar limits inward foot rolling during walking and standing, while the slip-resistant outsole provides clinical-grade traction. It’s a narrow combination to hit, and the Addiction Walker hits it.
The traction specifics: The leather outsole is treated with a slip-resistant compound that performs well on smooth wet surfaces. The wide, stable base also contributes to stability on slick floors — the broader platform reduces the leverage that creates slips during lateral movement. The full-grain leather upper is easy to clean and holds up to repeated disinfectant exposure better than mesh alternatives.
The honest trade-off: It’s heavy and warm. The leather construction that makes it so effective for structured support and easy cleaning also makes it less comfortable during fast-paced or physically demanding shifts. It’s best suited for standing-dominant roles in clinical environments — outpatient clinics, OR, procedural areas — rather than high-movement ER or float pool nursing. For active nursing roles needing both traction and motion control, this is the most capable option but not the most comfortable one.
Best for: Nurses with overpronation or flat feet who work in clinical environments requiring slip resistance and whose shifts are predominantly standing rather than high-speed movement.
4. Dansko XP 2.0 — Best for Standing-Heavy Roles
The Dansko XP 2.0 is the most established slip-resistant clog in clinical settings, and its presence on this list reflects the fact that for certain nursing roles — OR, surgical, procedural — the clog design with a slip-resistant outsole is genuinely the best combination available.
Clogs provide a rigid platform that distributes body weight evenly during prolonged stationary standing (check out our full guide on best shoes for standing all day). For nurses who spend most of their shift in one place, this platform stability reduces the pressure concentration under the heel and midfoot that accumulates during sustained standing in more flexible shoes. The XP 2.0 adds a slip-resistant outsole to this standing-optimized design, making it appropriate for clinical floors.
The traction specifics: The XP 2.0’s slip-resistant pods on the outsole provide grip on smooth hospital floors. The rigid platform also contributes to slip resistance in an indirect way — it limits the ankle dorsiflexion that creates instability during slips, keeping the foot in a more controlled position if traction is challenged.
The honest trade-off: There is a real break-in period of 1 to 2 weeks before clogs become comfortable. The rigid platform that makes them great for standing makes them awkward for fast movement and quick pivots — in a high-movement environment like the ER, this becomes a genuine limitation. Clogs also provide less slip protection during fast direction changes than flexible-soled shoes because the rigid platform creates more leverage during pivots. They belong in standing-dominant clinical roles, not high-movement ones.
Best for: OR nurses, surgical techs, procedural nurses, and any role where prolonged stationary standing dominates and movement demands are predictable and slow.
5. Skechers Sure Track — Best Budget Option
The Skechers Sure Track is the most accessible entry point for nurses who need genuine workplace slip resistance without a premium price tag — and unlike the general Skechers Arch Fit that appears in other guides, the Sure Track line is specifically designed as a workplace shoe with tested traction rather than a comfort shoe with slip-resistant marketing.
The distinction matters. The Sure Track has an ASTM-rated outsole designed for smooth workplace surfaces. The memory foam insole provides reasonable comfort for moderate shift lengths. The leather or synthetic upper handles clinical cleaning reasonably well. For nurses who need a reliable slip-resistant shoe while on a budget, or who need a backup pair while saving for a premium option, it covers the basics competently.
The honest trade-off: Cushioning depth and durability are the real limitations. For high-mileage nursing shifts above 15,000 steps daily, the Sure Track’s cushioning compresses faster than premium options and provides less protection. The midsole typically needs replacement at 4 to 6 months with daily hospital use. For nurses dealing with plantar fasciitis, heel pain, or significant joint issues, the cushioning inadequacy becomes a real problem. This shoe is best for nurses with moderate demands and lower pain levels who need slip resistance at an accessible price.
Best for: New nurses, part-time healthcare workers, or anyone who needs a budget-accessible slip-resistant option while saving for a premium shoe. A practical starting point with honest limitations on cushioning and durability.
6. On Cloudrunner 2 — Best Lightweight Option (With Caveats)
The On Cloudrunner 2 is included here with an important caveat upfront: it is not ASTM F2913 rated for clinical slip resistance. It’s a performance running shoe with traction features that perform reasonably well on dry hospital floors and moderately well on lightly wet surfaces — but it does not have the independently tested clinical-grade traction of the other shoes on this list.
It earns its place here because a meaningful portion of nurses are choosing it for exactly the balance it offers — lightweight feel, responsive cushioning, and reasonable grip for environments where floor conditions are managed and the highest-risk fluid exposure situations are uncommon. For outpatient clinics, administrative healthcare roles, and units with good floor management, it’s a practical choice. For trauma environments and high fluid-exposure units, it isn’t.
What makes it work when it works: The rubber integrated into the CloudTec pod bases provides better grip than the foam-only contact surfaces of many lightweight shoes. The wider Cloudrunner platform compared to standard On models provides more inherent stability. The breathable mesh upper handles warm clinical environments well. And the lightweight construction reduces fatigue during fast-paced shifts in ways that heavier work shoes don’t.
The honest trade-off: No ASTM rating. On wet clinical tile with cleaning solution contamination — the standard hospital floor condition — its traction performance is meaningfully inferior to the ASTM-rated options on this list. Nurses who choose this shoe are making a judgment call about their specific environment’s risk level. That’s a reasonable call in many clinical settings. It’s not a reasonable call in trauma bays, OR, or any unit with regular fluid exposure.
Best for: Nurses in outpatient, clinic, and lower fluid-exposure inpatient settings who prioritize lightweight feel and are making an informed decision about the traction trade-off.
Which Slip-Resistant Shoe Is Right for Your Unit?
Highest fluid exposure — trauma, OR, procedural: Shoes For Crews Element III for maximum tested traction. HOKA Bondi SR if cushioning for long shifts is equally important.
Mixed walking and standing, standard inpatient: HOKA Bondi SR. The best balance of clinical traction and long-shift cushioning for most hospital nurses.
Standing-dominant roles — OR, surgical, clinic: Dansko XP 2.0 for pure standing endurance with clinical traction. Brooks Addiction Walker if overpronation is also a concern.
Budget constraint: Skechers Sure Track. Genuine workplace-rated traction at accessible pricing — with honest limitations on cushioning durability.
Lower fluid exposure, lightweight priority: On Cloudrunner 2 with clear understanding of its traction limitations relative to ASTM-rated options.
Common Mistakes When Buying Slip-Resistant Nursing Shoes
Assuming all running shoes with ‘slip-resistant’ marketing are equivalent: They’re not. Most use this term to describe general grip rather than clinical-grade traction. Without an ASTM rating, you’re relying on marketing claims.
Choosing maximum traction over cushioning when you have foot conditions: The most slip-resistant shoe is useless if plantar fasciitis or joint pain forces you to compensate your gait. The Bondi SR exists specifically to avoid this trade-off. Check out our other articles on various foot conditions.
Wearing slip-resistant shoes past their effective lifespan: Outsole traction degrades with wear. The tread that provided excellent grip when the shoe was new may be significantly worn after 6 months of daily hospital use. Inspect outsoles periodically and replace when tread is visibly worn.
Judging slip resistance by feel on dry floors: A shoe that feels grippy on a dry hospital floor may perform very differently on a wet floor with cleaning solution. The ASTM test uses contaminated surfaces specifically because dry-floor grip doesn’t predict wet-floor performance.
FAQ
Are hospitals required to provide slip-resistant shoes?
Hospital policies vary. Some facilities mandate ASTM-rated footwear for specific units — particularly OR, food service, and environmental services roles. Most leave footwear choice to individual nurses while recommending slip-resistant options. Check your facility’s occupational health or safety policy for specific requirements in your unit.
How long do slip-resistant outsoles last?
The rubber compound and tread pattern that provide slip resistance wear with use. Most slip-resistant work shoes maintain their rated traction for 6 to 12 months of daily use, though high-mileage nurses may see degradation sooner. Inspect the outsole periodically — if tread grooves are visibly shallow or the rubber appears glazed, traction performance has diminished regardless of how the rest of the shoe looks.
Can I make regular shoes more slip-resistant?
Aftermarket slip-resistant products — sprays, sole covers, traction pads — exist but provide variable results and aren’t independently tested for clinical environments. They’re a stopgap, not a solution. For any environment with regular fluid exposure, a properly rated shoe is worth the investment.
Do slip-resistant shoes feel different from regular shoes?
Traditional dedicated work shoes with slip-resistant outsoles often feel firmer and heavier than athletic shoes. The Bondi SR and Sure Track both feel noticeably different from standard running shoes — more planted and structured. Modern options like the Bondi SR have largely closed that gap, but some difference in feel compared to lightweight athletic shoes remains.
Final Verdict
For most hospital nurses, the HOKA Bondi SR is the right answer — it’s the shoe that resolves the core tension in this category by providing genuine clinical-grade traction without compromising the cushioning that makes long shifts manageable. If you’re going to buy one slip-resistant nursing shoe and you want it to handle all hospital environments competently, this is it.
For nurses in the highest fluid-exposure environments where maximum traction is the priority above comfort, the Shoes For Crews Element III provides the most specialized clinical performance available and is the shoe that hospital safety officers actually recommend.
Whatever you choose, verify the ASTM F2913 rating rather than taking slip-resistant marketing at face value. In a clinical environment, the difference between a tested rating and an untested claim is a difference that matters.
Written by Saif Khan, Internal Medicine Resident at a major academic medical center. Saif created Comfort On Duty to provide clinically grounded footwear guidance for nurses and healthcare workers.
Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Last updated: May 2026